Theory of Justice - 972 Words

A Theory of Justice Within this essay, the Theory of Justice will be broke down. It will lay out some personal information on John Rawls. It will give the principles of the theory and explain what they mean. It will also explain how the principles of these theories differ from traditional utilitarianism. Lastly it will show how justice is defined by modern criminal justice agencies and other entities involved in the criminal justice system and how it differs from security. John Bordley Rawls is one of the most important philosophers of the twentieth century. He was born the son of William Lee Rawls and Anna Abel (Stump) Rawls on February 21, 1921, in Baltimore, Maryland. Rawls received a Bachelor of Arts degree from Princeton University†¦show more content†¦A utilitarianism society must look for ways to achieve this process while maintaining the balance and not disturbing the status in place. If there was a way to start a society using this method than it would make it easier to find out what m akes everyone happy plus what if fair and just for our society as a whole not just for our own wants and needs. Everyone would be equal. Meaning, no one person would be better in status or financially wealthier than the next. John Rawls rejected this saying it was a radical political idea and that this approach could override the rights of minorities. In modern day society, this could not happen because we as humans are not born equal. From our looks to our intelligence, we are all different so the hope that everyone could be equal would never happen. People are born wanting and needing different things most are things not just given by society but those we have to achieve on our own. It is the same way with the criminal justice system. Until a set of law and sentencing guidelines are written and used in all 50 states, the system will not and can never be a fair or equal one. In all fairness, Rawls did come up with a great idea and one to work from. Everyone wants things to be fair in their lives, from the two small children sharing a sandwich to the adults wanting to make as much money as their neighbor. The likely hood of this happening isShow MoreRelatedTheories of Justice3826 Words   |  16 PagesTHEORIES OF JUSTICE INTRODUCTION Justice is action in accordance with the requirements of law. It is suppose to ensure that all members of society receive fair treatment. Issues of justice arise in several different spheres and often play a significant role in causing, enabling, and addressing discord. The goal of the Justice System is to try to resolve and satisfy all these issues for the members of society. Injustice can lead to dissatisfaction, and/or rebellion. The different spheres expressRead MoreA Theory Of Justice By Rawls1569 Words   |  7 PagesIn Rawls’ book titled A Theory of Justice, Rawls aims to develop a theory of justice that brings new ideas and concepts to the traditional doctrines of philosophy. Rawls’ theory, justice as fairness, wishes to take the ideas of traditional social contract theories to a higher level of abstraction. His theory is thoroughly explained through a pre-societal position called the original position, the notion of the veil of ignorance, and the two principle s of justice. Rawls starts out by describingRead MoreSummary Of A Theory Of Justice 1095 Words   |  5 PagesMurillo Philosophy Applied Ethics Professor Jennings 12/2/14 Rawl’s: A Theory of Justice In our modern society where economic resources are gained by paid labor, there is often room for an unequal distribution of wealth. Hence, a laissez fare or â€Å"hands off† approach to the distribution of such economic resources will often case produce problems and inefficiencies in a society. Rawls says in his writing excerpts, â€Å"A Theory of Justice† from the Ethics in Practice textbook that a state ought to enforceRead MoreRawls Theory Of Justice1598 Words   |  7 Pagesconception of justice that serves the social contract theory more generally and abstractly than such social contract theories provided by Locke, Rousseau, and Kant. In contrast to Locke, Rousseau, and Kant, Rawls’ conception of justice does not provide a specific layout for the intricacies and structure of each social institution. His abstract concept of justness, however, provides the foundation from which a just institution must derive. Within Rawls’ theory of justice, he presents the theory of justiceRead MoreUtilitarianism And Justice Theory1396 Words   |  6 Pages Utilitarianism and Justice Theory Jacob Holman Northern Arizona University July 27, 2017 In the history of philosophy and ethics there have been many great philosophers who have come up with theories to understand if a decision is ethical, what rules should be followed to make ethical decisions, and if the results of decisions determine whether the decision is ethical or not. A comparison of Consequentialist theory and Justice theory will show that each have different methods ofRead MoreRawls Theory Of Justice1905 Words   |  8 Pages Rawls Theory of Justice Ming Chi Wang 36979110 University of British Columbia John Rawls in his work, â€Å"A Theory of Justice,† aims to make up a theory that will rivals intuitionalists and utilitarianism, which seeks truth in morality that cause results in maximizing utility for the maximum number of people. Rawls’ theory of justice is a distribution theory that maximizes primary goods for the worst outcome an individual could be in. By primary goodsRead MoreQuestions On The Theories Of Justice2659 Words   |  11 PagesIn this chapter, I aim to review and survey Karen Lebacqz’s six theories of Justice. This is essential if, as I will show later, these theories of justice will necessarily be implied in the founding documents and covenants of major social institutions in western civilization. Justice: Utility In its most basic definition, utilitarianism argues, â€Å"The right thing to do is to produce the most good.† According to John Stuart Mill, â€Å"‘utility’ or the ‘greatest happiness principle’ requires that actionsRead More A Theory of Justice Essay3836 Words   |  16 PagesA Theory of Justice Communitarian critics of Rawls have argued that his A Theory of Justice provides an inadequate account of individuals in the original position. Michael Sandel, in Liberalism and the Limits of Justice argues that Rawls conception of the person divorces any constitutive attachments that persons might have to their ends. Hence, Sandel asserts that Rawls privileges the standpoint of self-interested individuals at the expense of communal interests. I do not find Sandels specificRead MoreA Theory Of Justice By Rawls1317 Words   |  6 PagesIn his book ‘A Theory of Justice’, Rawls was dissatisfied with the traditional philosophical arguments about what makes a social institution just and about what justifies political or social actions and policies. The utilitarian argument holds that societies should pursue the greatest good for the greatest number. This argument has a number of problems, including, especially, that it seems to be consistent with the idea of the tyranny of m ajorities over minorities. The intuitionist argument holdsRead MoreRawls Theory of Justice1853 Words   |  8 PagesThe conventional accounts of Justice normally begin by stating a fundamental rule of Aristotle – Justice is to treat equals equally and unequals unequally, and that unequal treatment should be in proportion to the inequality. In everyday life though, justice is seen as an attribute of law, while all laws are not necessarily just. Many great socio- political movements of the world have focused from time to time on unjust laws eg Apartheid laws in South Africa and Caste laws in India. Impartiality